找工作真的要不断妥协吗？
." One is a reasonable response to a challenging market. The other is a self-defeating trade-off.
加州波托拉维利的“Leading Change Consulting & Coaching”公司总裁Steve Levin明确定义了“良好的弹性和吝啬的妥协”的分界线。一边是对市场变化做出的合理应对，而另一边就是弄巧成拙的交易。
To tell the difference, experts suggest asking these six questions:
专家建议通过以下的六个问题来分辨这其中的差异：
1）How badly do you need money? If you're about to lose your home or are having trouble putting food on the table, you may need to take whatever job is offered.
你有多需要钱？如果你马上就要失去家庭了或连吃饭都成问题了，你可能就需要接受一切提供给你的工作了。
2）Will the job make you miserable? Taking a job that's not right for you increases the risk that you'll be laid off again within a few months -- something that can make it even harder to find the next job. If you will feel resentful rather than excited about the job, you might be better off continuing your search.
这份工作是否会让你痛苦？如果选择一份不适合你的工作的话，那你在几个月之后会感到厌烦的几率就更大。有时候这一点甚至让你很难再找到下一份工作。如果你对这份工作的感觉是痛苦大过于兴奋的话，你最好还是继续找其他工作吧。
3）Can you explain why you're taking it? If you take a job that's less than your previous
one, you'll need to be able to explain this apparent step backward the next time you're looking. Saying you couldn't find anything else is not likely to impress an interviewer.
你能解释清楚你接受这份工作的原因么？如果你选择的这份工作还没不如上一份，那么在下次找工作的时候你就要解释得了退步的理由。如果你的理由是你找不到其他工作的话，这是不会给面试官留下深刻印象的。
But if you have a good reason for taking a position -- to gain experience in a new industry, for example, or to learn a new skill -- a step down doesn't have to hurt you.
但是如果你对接受该职位有很好的理由的话，如，为了在一个新行业学到经验、为了学到技能等，那么暂时，稍微差一点的选择不会给你带来什么损失。
4）What's most important to you? Perhaps you'd be willing to take less money as long as you got the title and authority you wanted. A longer commute may be morepalatable